<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edwalker.net &#187; public relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwalker.net/blog/category/public-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwalker.net/blog</link>
	<description>Musings on the web, journalism, marketing and communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:22:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Print isn&#8217;t dead &#8211; say PR</title>
		<link>http://www.edwalker.net/blog/2008/08/06/print-isnt-dead-say-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edwalker.net/blog/2008/08/06/print-isnt-dead-say-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-platform coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwalker.net/blog/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post from Nigel Barlow, he points out the recent research into the PR industry where the thinking is that print is still very valuable. My thought would be that surely multi-platform coverage is best and carries more weight? Your story in print, on tv and on radio &#8211; AND on each of these outlets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post from Nigel Barlow, <a title="Nigel Barlow: For PR people print is far from dead" href="http://thoughtsofnigel.blogspot.com/2008/08/for-pr-people-print-is-far-from-dead.html" target="_blank">he points out the recent research into the PR industry where the thinking is that print is still very valuable</a>. My thought would be that surely multi-platform coverage is best and carries more weight? Your story in print, on tv and on radio &#8211; AND on each of these outlets website is maximising coverage to the full.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edwalker.net/blog/2008/08/06/print-isnt-dead-say-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

